Low calorie sweeteners may satisfy the desire for sweetness, suggests new review


05 Dec 2017 --- Consumption of low-calorie sweeteners may have the advantage of satisfying desire for sweetness and controlling weight to some extent, according to a review of scientific literature examining their impact on weight control. The review, carried out by Professor Peter Rogers of the University of Bristol in the UK, negatively evaluates three common anti-sweetener arguments.

The review paper by Professor Rogers further evaluates three claims regarding the effect of low calorie sweeteners on energy intake and preference for sweetness: 1) the “sweet taste confusion” hypothesis, 2) the “sweet tooth” hypothesis and 3) the “conscious overcompensation” hypothesis.

Based on current evidence, the author concludes that there is little or no evidence in support of these claims in his review paper entitled “The role of low-calorie sweeteners in the prevention and management of overweight and obesity: evidence v. conjecture.”

Sweet taste confusion hypothesis
According to the “sweet taste confusion” theory, tested in animal studies, low calorie sweeteners would impair the body’s learned control of energy intake and weight regulation because there is a mismatch between sweet taste and calorie intake. The International Sweeteners Association (ISA) points out that there is no evidence supporting this hypothesis in humans.

The majority of animal studies do not confirm the theory that low-calorie sweeteners would disrupt the sweetness-energy association, a theory generated further to findings of a series of rat studies with saccharin by Swithers et al., the ISA notes. Indeed, the group reports that a recent study replicating the study design as in Swithers’ experiments concluded: “This result is in opposition to the findings of the Swithers group and others, but is consistent with the majority of animal and human research suggesting the effects of non-nutritive sweeteners are not more harmful than those of caloric sweeteners.”

The discrepancy in the results of studies of similar study design appears to be explained by a crucial difference in procedure, the ISA notes. It appears that a crucial piece of evidence used to support the claim that low-calorie sweeteners would disrupt the learned control of energy intake in Swithers et al. studies is based on false assumptions confounded by a procedural artefact, it adds.

Sweetness without calories and “sweet tooth”
The second argument against low-calorie sweeteners is the most prominent among policymakers claiming that the exposure to sweetness without calories may encourage a sweet tooth and therefore increased intake of sweet, energy-containing foods and beverages, ISA notes.

However, it points out that a large battery of evidence from both short- and longer-term human intervention studies does not support the “sweet tooth” hypothesis and rather indicates that the consumption of low-calorie sweeteners, studied mostly in the form of beverages, does not increase energy intake and may have to some extent the advantage of satisfying desire for sweetness when consumed shortly before or with a meal.

Conscious overcompensation when choosing calorie-reduced foods
There is also a question about human behavior and whether people may consciously overcompensate for “calories saved” when they know they are consuming low-calorie sweetened foods or beverages with fewer or no calories. The ISA reports that what is known to date from free-living intervention studies is that there is little or no conscious compensation when low calorie sweeteners are substituted for sugar as part of a calorie-counted weight loss diet.

On the other hand, the organization cites times when low-calorie sweetened foods are used as an excuse for indulgence, with the typical example being that of choosing a diet soda while eating a whole pizza. Full compensation may occur, the ISA concedes, but no one can predict if the same person would eat one less piece of pizza if a sugar-sweetened soda had instead been chosen.

In any case, the ISA points out that this certainly has to do with consumers’ nutrition education and cites the author’s conclusion that “taken together, there is little evidence for conscious compensation for low-calorie sweeteners’ consumption.”

Facts versus claims
Examining what is known to date about sweetness without calories and about the effect of low calorie sweeteners on energy intake and body weight, Professor Rogers concludes in the review that there is little or no evidence in support of claims suggesting that low-calorie sweeteners would undermine body weight regulation.

“At the very least, the reduced energy content of low calorie sweetened foods and beverages is not fully compensated, thus helping us to cut our daily calories down,” the ISA says. “And of course, reducing calorie intake and managing our overall energy balance (calories in – calories out) are key elements of successful weight loss. This is probably why longer-term intervention studies consistently confirm that the consumption of low calorie sweeteners in place of sugar in the diet can help in modest weight loss.”

Low-calorie sweeteners are not a “silver bullet” in weight loss and should not be seen as one, the ISA points out, but it adds that including low-calorie sweetened foods and drinks in the diet can be among the many strategies used in weight management efforts to help keep the enjoyment of sweet-tasting foods with fewer or no calories.

Miller PE & Perez V. Low-calories sweeteners and body weight and composition: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies. Am J Clin Nutr 2014;100:765–777.
Rogers PJ, Hogenkamp PS, de Graaf C et al. Does low-energy sweetener consumption affect energy intake and body weight? A systematic review, including meta-analyses, of the evidence from human and animal studies. Int J Obes 2016;40:381–394.
Rogers PJ. The role of low-calorie sweeteners in the prevention and management of overweight and obesity: evidence v. conjecture. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 2017 Nov 23:1-9

To contact our editorial team please email us at editorial@cnsmedia.com

Related Articles

Nutrition & Health News

Sports nutrition mainstreams: A key theme at Vitafoods Europe 2018

18 May 2018 --- Boundaries are blurring as sports nutrition continues to move mainstream. Ingredients and products aimed at promoting active living were a clear standout theme at Vitafoods Europe this year. New launches targeted a wide scope of aspects related to active lifestyles, and are likely to resonate not just with hardcore athletes but also with consumers of different ages and activity groups. 

Nutrition & Health News

Nestlé for Healthier Kids initiative: “Reach 50 million kids by 2030”  

17 May 2018 --- Nestlé is beefing up their children's nutrition programme with a focus on developing health fortified and sugar and salt reduced products. The move is hoped to offer children more nutritious food options, as part of Nestlé's wider Healthier Kids initiative. Other key goals of the on-going initiative include: “Building knowledge on children’s nutritional needs and inspiring parents & caregivers to raise healthier kids,” a Nestlé spokesperson tells NutritionInsight.

Nutrition & Health News

Calories from sugar-sweetened drinks deemed most harmful, review finds

16 May 2018 --- A group of scientists have agreed that sugar-sweetened beverages play a unique role in chronic health problems, elevating their calorie status to more harmful than calories from other foods and drinks. The conclusions come from a position paper, published in Obesity Review, compiled by a group of researchers. Also highlighted in the paper was the overall difficulty in conducting and interpreting nutritional research. 

Nutrition & Health News

Oral health: Natural products rising and good-for-your teeth sweets

15 May 2018 --- In line with the personal care market, oral health products are increasingly marketing themselves from a natural positioning, as well as a cosmetic one. “Beauty from within” claims all contribute to a more holistic understanding of wellbeing and consumers are increasingly looking to inherent health benefits from natural ingredients which convey better-for-you appeal. NutritionInsight covers a range of innovative products and suppliers tapping into the tooth-care market. When it comes to teeth, more than a shiny, white veneer is the goal: strong teeth and a healthy mouth – chemical free, are increasingly in demand. 

Nutrition & Health News

Golden spice: Turmeric finds appeal in organic NPD

11 May 2018 --- Touting a vast array of health benefits, turmeric has been trending for quite some months now. The golden spice was one of the standout trends at Vitafoods Europe 2017, and it has since made its way into a wide range of food and beverages launched over the past year. The application of turmeric was a standout theme at this year’s Natural and Organic Products show in London held the end of April. NutritionInsight looks at some of the offerings on show.

More Articles
URL : http://www.nutritioninsight.com:80/news/low-calorie-sweeteners-may-satisfy-the-desire-for-sweetness-suggests-new-review.html